Archive for February, 2009

How much does it cost to catch ultra-blond terrorists surfing the web? £42,000 a year, apparently

When a super-terrorist needs to relax after a hard day’s murder, we all know they like nothing better than searching for hair bleach products online, right? Which would explain why searching for “hydrogen peroxide” on Google (UK version) comes up with the following:

Do you want to bleach your hair too? Then help us find terrorists just like you!

Do you want to bleach your hair too? Then help us find terrorists just like you!

Of course, the police might be unlucky and their megalomaniac target might not feel like giving themselves a radical makeover. (Geddit?) But for once the knackers’ knackers have thought of that, which is why they also spent our money advertising their need for intelligence (geddit!?!) for at least the following terms, as documented by the extremely valuable and hard-working spyblog:

Religious Extremist
Fascism Extremist
Fascist Extremist
Left Wing Extremist
police [still goes to the anti-terrorism hotline page]
terrorism
extremist
Right wing extremist
Muslim Extremism
Radical Extremist
Animal extremist
Left wing extremist
Islamic extremist
Green extremist
Eco extremist

Whether the culprit is then willing to own up that, yes, they are pretty dangerous individuals and should be apprehended immediately is left to someone else to deal with.

So how much does all this advertising cost? According to a Freedom of Information request that I put to the London Metropolitan Police Service, the answer is: £42,000 per year. The full answer was as follows:

The planned spend for Google search on the Counter Terrorism Campaign for FY 08/09 is £42,000. The Metropolitan Police Service does not currently run ad word search sponsored links on other search engines.

Another FOI request is underway to find out why no other search engines were used, how search terms were decided upon, how the appropriate budget was decided, and how the cost-effectiveness of the campaign was evaluated, and which stakeholders were consulted in the forming of policy on this matter. I will put up whatever I get here within at most one year of receiving it, I promise.

UPDATE: The FOI request and any responses to it (which so far is just an acknowledgement of receipt) can be viewed here at whatdotheyknow.com, another superbly helpful website for the lay activist from the chaps and chapesses at mysociety.org. The statuary two-week response time seems to have been increased to four weeks, though, so I’m not expecting any substantive response until the 27th of March at the earliest. Last time I had to remind the Met that the two week period, as it was then, was up; I received a response the same day. Could it be that maybe they don’t want to release the information unless you remind them? That seems to be what happened with this request, for example.

Leave a Comment

Graphs of the Economist: Permanent Edition

Unsurprisingly I didn’t keep up with my extremely intermittent series of Graphs of the Economist. In the meantime, though, I took the trouble to set up an RSS feed that will deliver a dose of Economist graphingdom every. Single. Day. Right to your, erm, RSS feed reader.

Get it here: http://feed43.com/economistdailychart.xml

Leave a Comment

Real Help Now — for you or for them?

Compare:

www.realhelpnow.gov.uk
www.realhelpnow.org.uk

Discuss.

NB. I’m trying to find out how the hell the Government thought it could come up with such a monstrosity and get away with it: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/consultation_and_budget_relating

Comments (1)

More trouble in the Middle East — with the y-axis

Who is going to get how many seats in the Israeli general election today? Let’s look at the exit polls, courtesy of Ha’aretz:

Exit poll results... sort of

Exit poll results... sort of

Wow, the Labor Party and Yisrael Beitenu are doing pretty badly. They are only predicted to gain one quarter of the seats that Likud and Kadima are projected to get! But, wait a second. 15 is one half of 30, not a quarter, right? So how did they get the graph to look like that? The bars match up perfectly with the y-axis; they have interpolated the numbers between 15 and 30 correctly. What’s going on??

Oh. I see. It’s a, *cough*, “non-linear scale”. Got it. And this is the country with one of the highest per-capita levels of PhD holdership in the world. Come on Ha’aretz, wake up!

.

Leave a Comment